"Foreign Policy":Israel Is Going to War in Syria to Fight Iran
Sunday 01/October/2017 - 12:20 PM
BY JONATHAN SPYER:
Israeli officials believe that Iran is winning its bid for dominance in the Middle East، and they are mobilizing to counter the regional realignment that threatens to follow. The focus of Israel’s military and diplomatic campaign is Syria. Israeli jets have struck Hezbollah and Syrian regime facilities and convoys dozens of times during Syria’s civil war، with the goal of preventing the transfer of weapons systems from Iran to Hezbollah. In an apparent broadening of the scope of this air campaign، on Sept. 7 Israeli jets struck a Syrian weapons facility near Masyaf responsible for the production of chemical weapons and the storing of surface-to-surface missiles.
The strike came after a round of diplomacy in which Israeli officials concluded that their concerns regarding the developing situation in Syria were not being addressed with sufficient seriousness in either the United States or Russia. A senior delegation led by Mossad chief Yossi Cohen visited Washington in late August، reportedly to express Israel’s dissatisfaction with the emerging U.S.-Russian understanding on Syria. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Russian President Vladimir Putin in Sochi to raise similar concerns with Moscow. In both cases، the Israelis were disappointed with the response. Their overriding concern in Syria is the free reign that all the major players there seem willing to afford Iran and its various proxies in the country. And as long as nobody else addresses that concern in satisfactory، Israel is determined to continue addressing it on its own.
Iranian forces now maintain a presence close to or adjoining the Israeli-controlled portion of the Golan Heights and the Quneitra Crossing that separates it from the Syrian-controlled portion of the territory. Israel has throughout the Syrian war noted a desire on the part of the Iranians and their Hezbollah clients to establish this area as a second line of active confrontation against the Jewish state، in addition to south Lebanon.
“Syria،” of course، hardly exists today. The regime is in the hands of its Iranian and Russian masters، and half of the country remains outside its control. But the Iran-led bloc and its clearly stated intention to eventually destroy Israel certainly do exist، and the de facto buffer against them may be disappearing. Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah recently declared “victory” in the Syrian war، adding that what remained was “scattered battles.”
With the prospect of pro-Iranian forces reaching Bukamal on the Syrian-Iraqi border، this opens up the possibility of the much-reported Iranian “land corridor” stretching uninterrupted from Iran itself to a few kilometers from the Israeli-controlled Golan. Earlier this month، Israel shot down an Iranian drone over the Golan Heights. It was the latest evidence of Iran’s activities on the border. Syrian opposition reports have noted an Iranian presence in Tal Al-Sha’ar area، Tal Al-Ahmar، and Division 90 headquarters، all in the vicinity of the border. Pro-Iran forces، meanwhile، are open in their ambitions. Hezbollah al-Nujaba، an Iraqi Shiite force supported by Iran، has formed a “Golan Liberation” unit and declared itself “ready to take action to liberate the Golan.” Senior figures from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Basij have been photographed in areas close to the border.
Israel has so far thwarted these ambitions in two ways. First، it has launched attacks to frustrate and interdict attempts to build a paramilitary infrastructure in the area. Most famously، the killing of Jihad Mughniyeh، son of Hezbollah military chief Imad Mughniyeh، in a targeted strike at Mazraat Amal in the Quneitra area in January 2015 was part of this effort. Five other Hezbollah members and a general of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards، Mohammad Allahdadi، were also killed in the strike.
Second، Israel has developed pragmatic working relations with the local rebel groups who at the moment still control the greater part of the border، such as the Fursan al-Joulan group. This cooperation focuses on treating wounded fighters and civilians، and providing humanitarian aid and financial assistance. There has also probably been assistance in the field of intelligence، though no evidence has yet emerged of direct provision of weapons or direct engagement of Israeli forces on the rebels’ behalf.
On July 9، a ceasefire agreement directly brokered by the United States and Russia for southwest Syria was announced. It posits the establishment of a de-escalation zone in Syria’s southwest، in the area of the Quneitra and Daraa provinces. The details of the de-escalation zone are still being negotiated. But Israel has been deeply concerned that it could seriously complicate the de facto Israeli safeguards in place against Iranian infiltration of the border. If the fighting ends، physical resistance to encroachment will become more complicated and sponsorship of rebels potentially no longer relevant. As of now، Russian attempts to assure Israel that the terms of the ceasefire adequately address its concerns in this regard have evidently failed to persuade. The latest media reports on the negotiations for the zone suggest that the United States has reached an agreement with Moscow that pro-Iranian militias will be kept 25 miles from the border.
But the issue goes beyond arrangements at the southwestern edge of Syria. Israel is concerned by Iran’s overarching regional ambitions. Recent comments by Nasrallah، the Hezbollah leader، that a future war with Israel might involve additional pro-Iranian militia forces to the Lebanese groups have been well noted in Jerusalem. Israeli Intelligence Minister Yisrael Katz recently told a security conference in Herzliya، as reported by Reuters، that in a future war between Israel and Hezbollah the latter may be able to make use of an Iranian naval port، bases for Iran’s air and ground forces، and “tens of thousands of Shiite militiamen being brought in from various countries.”
A recent report in the London-based Al-Quds al-Arabi described Iranian plans to thin out the Sunni Arab population between Damascus and the border with Lebanon، expelling Sunni residents and replacing them with pro-government Shiites from elsewhere in the country or outside it. Israeli strategic culture tends to emphasize addressing immediate threats، but these potential demographic developments are also being watched closely in Jerusalem.
This all forms a larger picture in which Israel sees a major shift underway in the regional balance of power، to the benefit of the Iran-led regional bloc. Anyone who has received briefings from senior Israeli security officials in recent years has become familiar with a conception of the region as divided into four broad blocs: Iran and its (mainly Shiite) allies; a loose group of countries opposed to Iran that includes the Arab autocracies of the Gulf (excluding Qatar)، along with Egypt، Jordan، and Israel itself; an alliance of conservative Sunni Islamist forces، such as Turkey، Qatar، Hamas، the Muslim Brotherhood، and Sunni Arab rebels in Syria; and finally the regional networks of Sunni Salafi jihadism، most notably the Islamic State and al Qaeda.
There are problems with this picture، and it contains simplifications. Most notably، the line between the conservative Sunni Islamists and the Salafis has always been blurred. There is an additional blurred line، in which authoritarian rulers such as Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi have some sympathy for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Nevertheless، the picture was a serviceable one، adhering to many of the clear realities of the Middle East over the last decade and a half.
But the tectonic plates of this picture are now shifting، most notably to the clear detriment of the two camps associated with Sunni political Islam. The period of Arab unrest in 2010، during which Islamist and Salafi forces seemed briefly ascendant، is now a spent force — its beneficiaries in retreat and in some cases eclipsed by Sunni autocrats and pro-Iranian forces. Hamas is seeking to rebuild its relations with Iran. Former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi languishes in jail. Islamists in Tunisia are a minority element in the government، and Qatar is under attack from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates because of its stances in recent years. And the Syrian Sunni Arab rebels، once the great cause of this group، are now stranded — fighting for survival and without hope of victory against the Assad regime. The Salafis، too، are in eclipse، at least as political contenders.
Looked at from Israel، this process is a mixed bag. Sunni Islamists are hostile to Israel، of course، and for the most part، their failure to assemble a lasting power bloc is welcomed in Jerusalem. Senior Israeli security officials describe، for example، Sisi’s 2013 coup deposing the Muslim Brotherhood as a species of “miracle.” In Syria، however، the insurgent efforts of the Sunni Islamists had at least the benefit of distracting the attentions of the more formidable enemy — the Iran-led regional bloc. For five years، Israel was largely able to sit by while Sunni and Shiite political Islam were in a death’s embrace just north and east of the border. Russian and Iranian intervention، however، appears to have tipped the balance against the Sunni rebels، threatening to bring the long chapter of active civil war in Syria to a close.
From an Israeli point of view، we are back to the pre-2010 Middle East، when Israel and pro-western Sunni powers understood they were in a direct faceoff with the Iranians and their allies. But in 2017، there is the additional complicating factor of a direct Russian physical presence in the Levant، in alliance or at least in cooperation with Israel’s enemies.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration، which remains exclusively focused on the war against the Islamic State، has done little to assuage Israeli concerns. Trump and those around him، of course، share the Israeli assessment regarding the challenge of Iranian regional ambitions. The impression، however، is that the administration may well not be sufficiently focused or concerned to actually take measures necessary to halt the Iranian advance — both military and political — in Syria، Iraq، or Lebanon.
Where does this leave Israel?
First، Israel’s diplomatic avenues to the international power brokers in Syria remain open. When it comes to Washington، Israel’s task is to locate or induce a more coherent American strategy to counter advance of the Iranians in the Levant. Its goal when it comes to Moscow is to ensure sufficient leeway from Putin، who has no ideological animus against Israel and no special sympathy for Tehran، so that Israel can take the measures it deems necessary to halt or deter the Iranians and their proxies.
Second، Israel will continue to rely on its military defenses، which remain without peer in the region. And as shown in Masyaf، they can be employed to halt and deter provocative actions by the Iran-led bloc where necessary. Nevertheless، as seen from Jerusalem، the shifting regional tectonic plates are producing a new situation in which the Iran-led alliance is once again directly facing Israel، consequently raising the possibility of direct confrontation. Masyaf was not the first shot in the fight between Israel and its proxies in the Levant — and it is unlikely to be the last.