Iraq’s Baghdad metro project overshadowed by corruption concerns
Exciting developments lie ahead for Iraq’s transportation sector as two major projects take center stage: the introduction of Baghdad’s metro system and the establishment of a high-speed railway connecting Najaf and Karbala. Nevertheless, some Iraqi analysts are voicing apprehension over the government’s decision to collaborate with potentially inexperienced companies, leading to speculation that corruption could be a driving force behind these initiatives.
During a recent investment opportunities launch event for two projects, Iraq’s Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani highlighted the significance of these ventures. He shared that the planned Baghdad metro project, with its impressive span of 148 km and seven lines, is set to greatly enhance transportation for the capital’s population, which surpasses 8 million residents. The Prime Minister also mentioned that the project will extend its reach to various areas of Baghdad and create vital links with newly developed cities like Al-Jawahir, Ali Al-Wardi, and New Sadr City.
He also highlighted that these projects offer significant economic advantages and great opportunities for substantial private-sector engagement.
On Wednesday, the media office of Iraq’s PM issued a statement clarifying the bidding process of the two mega projects after Iraqi observers and social media activists criticised the government for mishandling the strategic projects of inexperienced companies.
According to the clarification, the two projects have been accredited to a consortium composed of the Malaysian HSS company and its regional partner accredited to implement its projects in the Middle East and North Africa region (CHSS).
At its regular session on 26 December 2023, the Iraqi cabinet issued Decision No. 23753, in which nine hundred and thirteen billion and eight hundred and four million Iraqi dinars were allocated to the investment budget of Baghdad’s municipality.
The government also claimed it secured contracts with HSS and CHSS for the two strategic projects, leveraging “advanced international expertise at a reduced cost. A specialised agreement with the Consultative Alliance emphasises audit and supervision, guaranteeing cost savings and top-quality project specifications.”
“After thorough analysis, the economic contract model was revised from government budget implementation to investment by international companies. This approach ensures that both projects are executed without burdening the government budget, departing from previous proposals that relied on government implementation,” reads another part of the statement.
“After negotiations, the consulting contract’s value was set at 0.6% of the total project value, below the government’s maximum limit of 0.8%. Additionally, the project investor will cover the consulting contract amount in the future, relieving the government of financial burden,” it added.
“Therefore, the government contracted with the global consulting consortium for an amount less than that approved in Cabinet Decision No. (23753), which was based on the previous economic model (government implementation),” the government clarified.
Basil Hussein, an Iraqi academic and head of Kulwatha Center for Studies and Measurement of Iraqi Public Opinion, in a post on X Thursday, 15 February claimed that if the consulting contract awarded to the HSS and the Malaysian CHSS, “[a]mounts to US$700 million and the total project cost is US$17.5 billion, this means that the percentage of the consulting contract from the total contract is 4%, not as announced by the government, which is 0.6% of the total contract value.”
He also emphasised that the “consulting contract cost should have aligned with the percentage announced by the government, amounting to US$105 million. However, the declared consulting contract cost is approximately six times its actual price, as it pertains to a project valued at US$116 billion, not US$17.5 billion. Consequently, we urge the government to revoke this consulting contract based on the outlined reasons.”
Iraqi MP’s media office also called on the media to “ensure accuracy in reporting facts and to verify information from its official sources to avoid disseminating inaccurate information.”
On his part, Murad Ismael, president and co-founder of Sinjar Academy, in a post on the X platform, claimed that the Iraqi government is engaged in hiring two ‘Lebanese’ and Malaysian companies to design the Baghdad metro, with an estimated cost of around US$1 billion.
He also raised concerns and questions regarding the identity of these companies and why a renowned entity in the field, mainly from Europe, such as German firms known for their expertise in this sector, was not chosen at a more reasonable price.
The concern arises regarding the identity of these companies and why a renowned entity in the field, mainly from Europe, such as German firms known for their expertise in this sector, was not chosen at a more reasonable price.
According to the CHSS’s official website, it is a UAE-based company that “has grown organically over the last 15 years and now has offices in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Ajman, and Sharjah.”
Al-Sumaria News, an Iraqi outlet, has raised the question of how investors will spend nearly US$17.5 billion in Baghdad’s metro to be paid off by Iraq over the next 23 years, per Iraqi government officials’ statements.
Decades of war and corruption have made Iraq face serious infrastructure problems, including bad roads and outdated public transportation means.
Iraq ranked 154 out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s corruption perceptions index in 2023.
