USC’s decision to cancel Asna Tabassum’s valedictorian speech is criticized as ‘fostering hate’

Meet Asna Tabassum, the impressive biomedical engineering student who has been named valedictorian of her class, thanks to her outstanding academic achievements. Along with pursuing a minor in “Resistance to Genocide”, Asna has shown empathy towards Palestinians and criticized Israel through a few shared posts, despite not actively involving herself in Middle East politics. Her dedication to her studies and her stance on humanitarian issues make her a standout student worth recognizing.

Just hours after USC announced Tabassum as the valedictorian, she was doxxed on social media, resulting in thousands of threatening messages being sent to the university, although the specific content of these messages has not been disclosed.

This apparently was enough to spook USC administrators, who announced the cancellation of their valedictorian’s speech, a move that likely was intended to prevent controversy but which ultimately did the opposite. The decision has elicited widespread support for Tabassum and condemnation of USC.

“USC’s decision to cancel Asna Tabassum’s speech empowers voices of hate and censorship and violates USC’s obligation to protect its students from dishonest and defamatory attacks,” Hussam Ayloush, executive director of Los Angeles chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told The New Arab.

In the university’s statement on the cancellation of the speech, USC Provost Andrew Guzman wrote in a lengthy public missive, without mentioning Israel or Palestine, “After careful consideration, we have decided that our student valedictorian will not deliver a speech at commencement. While this is disappointing, tradition must give way to safety.”

Many were quick to point out that last year, USC hosted a speech by former President Barack Obama, and the university was able to provide him with the security he needed.

“I’ve never heard of a university cancelling a graduation speech by a duly chosen valedictorian. If USC is afraid of disruption, they should increase their security,” Edward Ahmed Mitchell, national depury director of CAIR, told TNA. He added that he  worries this could affect the chances of Muslims or other minorities being chosen as valedictorians in the future. 

Based on the university’s public statement, USC will still be having dozens of student speakers at their 2024 commencement ceremony, which raises the question as to why Tabassum has been singled out.

For her part, the valedictorian appears to be taking the controversy in stride, after recovering from the initial shock of the university’s decision. She has appeared on multiple news programmes, saying that she wasn’t given any details of the alleged security threats and hadn’t even written her speech when she was informed it was cancelled. 

“Ultimately, my message is one of hope,” Tabassum said in an interview Thursday with Democracy Now. “I also want to do a message of inspiration so that our graduates and my peers can feel empowered to take on issues of world concern and see themselves in positions of making change.”

With time still left until USC’s commencement ceremony, many are hoping the university will reconsider their decision. The Los Angeles Times has written an editorial condemning USC’s decision. Meanwhile, CAIR has initiated a petition to reinstate Tabassum as valedictorian speaker, which by late Thursday evening had garnered 38,000 signatures in less than 48 hours.

“The tremendous response from the community in support of Asna highlights the urgent need for our colleges and universities to take action to address anti-Palestinian and anti-Muslim hate on campuses and to create a safe environment for each and every one of their students,” said Ayloush from CAIR. 

He added, “In a time of such blatant atrocities happening in Gaza, it is crucial that people engage in their fundamental right to speak out against injustice, and even more importantly, that colleges and universities uphold their duty to allow students to exercise this right safely and without fear of harassment, doxxing, censorship, or other hateful attacks.”